home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ The Supreme Court / The Supreme Court.iso / pc / briefs / 1992 / 92_1482 / 1482p025.tif (.png) < prev    next >
Tagged Image File Format  |  1995-08-30  |  90KB  |  1696x2200
Labels: book | daily | reckoner | sky
OCR: does not apply to officers in the Armed Services .: view which the 'Solicitor General has refused to embrace both below and in his opposition to this petition. Moreover this Court observed Buckiey Vateo 12 (1976) ino class or type of officer excluded [from the Appointments Clause] because of its special functions. See also Rostker v. Goldberg 453 U 6 (1981) "None of this say that Congress tre: disregard the Constitution when acts the area military affairs Accordingly the question before the Court not whether the Appointments Clause applies, but whether it is satisfied the current statutory scheme This Court has considered the Appointments Clause n trilogy of cases beginning with Buckley Valeo The most relevant discussion for this case contained 1n Freytag Commissioner 111 S.Ct. 2631 (1991) ...